MicroSoft's Philosophy on Information Architecture

While look­ing around inside the Share­point doc­u­men­ta­tion, I found this tasty snip­pet that explains a great deal about the way Microsoft approaches infor­ma­tion archi­tec­ture, prob­a­bly design and archi­tec­ture:
“Cre­at­ing an effec­tive cat­e­gory struc­ture requires plan­ning and some under­stand­ing of how oth­ers might orga­nize the con­tent.“
Yes, that’s right — you only need SOME under­stand­ing of how oth­ers MIGHT orga­nize the con­tent. No need to get the right peo­ple, even — any­one off the street will do, as long as they are clearly a mem­ber of the group ‘oth­ers’, so maybe even the neighbor’s kid would be fine.
Besides, I’m sure the incon­ve­nience asso­ci­ated with try­ing to develop a decent infor­ma­tion archi­tec­ture informed by knowl­edge of users’ men­tal mod­els would prob­a­bly get in the way of all that plan­ning that’s so impor­tant to the suc­cess of your por­tal project.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • connotea
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Posterous
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Slashdot
  • email

Category: Information Architecture
Tags: , , , One comment »

One Response to “MicroSoft's Philosophy on Information Architecture”

  1. Travis

    This is what hap­pens when any­one cre­ative gets too involved with the money side of busi­ness instead of just cre­at­ing. I have recently read Pride Before the Fall: The Tri­als of Bill Gates and the End of the Microsoft Era by John Heile­mann, which is sup­pos­edly a non bias book. In the book it is all to clear that he cares noth­ing for the advance­ment of tech­nol­ogy only the power and money asso­ci­ated with sell­ing mediocre prod­ucts, which his dom­i­na­tion of, only hin­ders true leaps and bounds in the soft­ware indus­try. A com­pany like Microsoft has helped soci­ety, but have they hurt our soft­ware and hard­ware econ­omy more by using bul­ly­ing and monop­o­lis­tic tac­tics. That is the real ques­tion and after using Microsoft prod­ucts since their birth I feel that we are no longer get­ting what we think we are and what we should have after so many years of research.


Leave a Reply



Back to top