Joe Lamantia.com
strategy + architecture + design: integrated experiences« Don Norman, Bruce Sterling, The Attention Economy Home Iraq Reconstruction, Enterprise Style »
Of Madeleines And Metadata
January 23, 2006 02:08 PM | Posted in: User Experience (UX)A few months ago, I put up a posted called Tagging Comes To Starbucks, in which I attempted to make the point that it's bizarre when a product's metadata *overwhelms the experience of the product itself in it's customary real world setting*.
My example was the metadata encrusted packaging of madeleines - "petite french cakes..." - at Starbucks. Like the famous toothpick instructions Douglas Adams immortalized in So Long and Thanks For All The Fish, this is a strong discontinuity of experience (though not necessarily one indicating things gone awry at the core of civilization) that implies new cognitive / perceptual phenomenon.
New experiences and frames of reference usually lack descriptive vocabulary, which explains why I can't pin this down neatly in words. But this is surely something we can expect to encounter more in a future populated with findable things called spimes.
The balance hasn't shifted so far that we're living inside Baudrillard's 'desert of the real', but we are getting closer with each additional layer of simulation, abstraction, and metadata applied to real situations and objects.
After all it is impossible to interact (smell, touch, taste...) directly with these very ordinary pastries without experiencing the intervening layers of metadata packaging.
Madeleines in situ:

The labeling:

From SLATFATF: "It seemed to me that any civilization that had so far lost its head as to need to include a set of detailed instructions for use in a package of toothpicks, was no longer a civilization I could live in and stay sane." ~ Wonko the Sane
local tags: baudrillard, culture, douglas_adams, metadata, semantics, spime, starbucks, tagging, ux
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Of Madeleines And Metadata.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.joelamantia.com/cgi-bin/mt4/mt-tb.cgi/248

del.icio.us/jlamantia
Add me to your network
http://www.findability.org/ not findabilify ...although i'm off to buy that one now ;)
thanks for pointing out my typo - i confess i was on a conference call while writing up the post...
meanwhile, in the spirit of peter morville, who's been coining so many tasty neologisms - like spatiosemantic - recently, i'd like to nominate "findabilify" as a proper verb, meaning:
1. to render findable
2. to make easily found
btw - does anyone know what the revenue from domain squatting on common mispellings is like these days? i'm thinking of switching businesses away from consulting
I didn't bring the same structure to my own analysis recently of a Dreyer's package/label/brand at http://chittahchattah.blogspot.com/2005/04/how-many-attributes-can-we-cram-into.html but maybe you'll be similarly bemused.
where can I buy this product other than Starbucks stores? These are so good that I want to more and more for a cheaper price than what it is at Starbucks. Is that possible?
Thanks
Ly